PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.53%
Similar revenue growth to MRVL's 14.60%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
18.46%
Similar cost growth to MRVL's 16.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
2.69%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MRVL's 12.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.64%
Similar R&D growth to MRVL's 12.03%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.11%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of MRVL's 7.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
14.92%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 11.74%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.89%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 11.10%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-6.51%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 25.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.89%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 9.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.51%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 87.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.65%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 63.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.97%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 19.68%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-5.49%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 75.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.75%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 53.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.33%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 22.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.30%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 116.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.72%
Net margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 88.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.00%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 133.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.92%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.92%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
3.95%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 5.58%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.