PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.05%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.25%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 9.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
7.69%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MRVL's 11.62%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
7.74%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.00%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 5.98%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 61.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
9.24%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 19.63%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.06%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 14.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.57%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 1.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-50.35%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.27%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.31%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.37%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 3.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
1.67%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.71%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
156.27%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.66%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.08%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.27%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.14%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
10.51%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 5.68%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.