PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.36%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 10.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.20%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 10.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.87%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 10.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.60%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 0.01% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
9.86%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.21%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.07%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.95%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 4.87%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.83%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.73%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-84.09%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 22.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.88%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 10.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-84.09%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 83.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.54%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 66.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.37%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-76.02%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 76.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 60.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-76.02%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 21.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-76.02%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 97.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.19%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 79.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.73%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.65%
Share count reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.59%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.31% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.