PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.61%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 6.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
3.80%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 9.06%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
13.26%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.26%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
32.42%
Similar R&D growth to MRVL's 40.66%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
31.89%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 25.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
11.48%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MRVL's 15.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.02%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-26.04%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
95.23%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 24.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-6.41%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.56%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 4.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.27%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.64%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.44%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 3.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
4.98%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.30%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.