PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.35%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
23.08%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
14.31%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.59%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.19%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.20%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x MRVL's 8.22%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
18.80%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.40%
D&A growth less than half of MRVL's 6.81%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
22.75%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
22.75%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.85%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.06%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 527.41%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
22.78%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.87%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.78%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.78%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.87%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.05%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.62%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.64%
Share count reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.39%
Diluted share increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.