PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.10%
Revenue growth below 50% of MRVL's 19.52%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.34%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 26.85%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
15.50%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 12.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
7.84%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
15.31%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 46.07%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.27%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 37.95%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.32%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 32.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.00%
D&A growth 1.1-1.25x MRVL's 31.88%. Bill Ackman would demand investment justification.
46.93%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.51%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.77%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.96%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.07%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.10%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.27%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-154.76%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
53.51%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.33%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.00%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
51.11%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.15%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.06%
Diluted share increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.