176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.94%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 2.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.89%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 0.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.44%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.59%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.44%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 4.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.36%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.04%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.63%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 2.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.26%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 818.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.06%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 799.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.97%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 72.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.15%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 72.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.63%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.47%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 66.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.63%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 67.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
280.21%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of MRVL's 438.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-19.11%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 62.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.80%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 63.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.76%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 62.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.12%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 62.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.34%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.03%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.