176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.78%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.41%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.15%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
11.54%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.69%
Margin expansion 50-75% of MRVL's 0.96%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-0.23%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 0.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.14%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 4.44%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
6.75%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 3.49%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.78%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
53.39%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.65%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.81%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.08%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.29%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 21.28%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
30.60%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
17.90%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
30.60%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of MRVL's 61.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
30.60%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.90%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.00%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.91%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.92%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.