PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.10%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-2.23%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.32%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 2.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.32%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 7.43% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
11.74%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.63%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.08%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.97%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-32.21%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 157.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.59%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 172.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.67%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 494.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.37%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 513.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.31%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-23.90%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 3903.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.64%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 4096.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
58.07%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 355.41%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-31.20%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 5309.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.26%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 5582.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.33%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 5354.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.50%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 4900.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.13%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.85%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
6.67%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 5.77%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.