176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-22.60%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 4.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
16.32%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-70.88%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 5.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-62.38%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 0.36% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.71%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 4.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.10%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 7.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.28%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 5.80%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.96%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-153.74%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-154.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-176.56%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-198.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.42%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 80.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-168.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-188.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-170.89%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-168.40%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 2.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-188.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-167.50%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-172.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.05%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.94% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-6.18%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 2.16% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.