PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.56%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-28.67%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
145.36%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
144.00%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.26%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.85%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-20.57%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.47%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.48%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
204.91%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
220.33%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 2.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
136.55%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
136.35%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-52.15%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 1630.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
141.61%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 10.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
141.38%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 17.58%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
97.10%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of MRVL's 164.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
151.06%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
150.78%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
151.85%
EPS change of 151.85% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
151.85%
Diluted EPS change of 151.85% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-2.09%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.84% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
1.64%
Diluted share increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.