PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-46.40%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-35.93%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-61.49%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.27%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
222.24%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 38.66%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-1.48%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-23.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.53%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 17.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-194.81%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-228.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-408.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-675.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.91%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-379.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-621.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2948.32%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-339.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-546.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-346.43%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-342.86%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.13%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-3.67%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.