PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
38.05%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.67%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
39.79%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
33.90%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.41%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
42.51%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
41.06%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 14.08%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
40.38%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 8.72%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.42%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-66.18%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.44%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.50%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 63.64%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-31.96%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.42%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.40%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 142.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-36.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.24%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-34.78%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.76%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.87%
Share count reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.63%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.28%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.