PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.03%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 4.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
24.11%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 6.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-70.57%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 3.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-63.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.42%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 4.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.17%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 2.82%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
15.45%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.83%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-13.75%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-187.27%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 0.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-250.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-218.87%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-246.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
84.87%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 212.26%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-212.16%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 8.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-238.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 3.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-313.89%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 323.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-202.45%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 6.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-226.52%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 1.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-203.33%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 6.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-206.90%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 10.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.98%
Share count reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.11%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-3.09%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.