PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.03%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.81%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.75%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.54%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.40%
Similar R&D growth to MRVL's 6.14%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.46%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 1.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.53%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-25.90%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.03%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
135.80%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.11%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
73.22%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.93%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3194.95%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 729.13%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
79.47%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.87%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-23.86%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 108.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
102.27%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.58%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.84%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.84%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.06%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.25%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.31%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.