PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.66%
Revenue growth below 50% of MRVL's 11.85%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.87%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 13.05%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
8.42%
Similar gross profit growth to MRVL's 11.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
2.61%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.00%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.91%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.56%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.55%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
4.37%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MRVL's 7.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-0.88%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.20%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.38%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of MRVL's 22.37%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
6.35%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of MRVL's 9.28%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
12.38%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 31.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.35%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 17.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
116.70%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 1046.79%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
13.46%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 33.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.38%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 18.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.14%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 317.02%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
12.09%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 31.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.09%
Net margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 17.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.62%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 39.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.55%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 40.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.10%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.07%
Diluted share increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.