PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.89%
Similar revenue growth to MRVL's 5.89%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
3.71%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 8.99%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
5.98%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.64%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.05%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.54%
R&D growth 50-75% of MRVL's 6.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.38%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 6.83%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.16%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 7.99%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-17.28%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.44%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.25%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.98%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.25%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.98%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
118.85%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 274.47%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
15.34%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.97%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.08%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.62%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.42%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.14%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.87%
EPS change of 15.87% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
15.87%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.95%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.06%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.