PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.60%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-9.08%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-11.98%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.04%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.24%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-74.20%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.94%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 10.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.38%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.64%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-39.17%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.75%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-34.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.25%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.25%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.72%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.82%
Diluted share increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.