176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.97%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 7.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.36%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 7.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.44%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 7.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.39%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.27%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.21%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.36%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.55%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
362.46%
Interest expense change of 362.46% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
5.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.98%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-62.15%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 23.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.64%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 15.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.46%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 34.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.64%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 25.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
88.89%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-38.11%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 26.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-36.22%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 17.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
94.78%
Similar tax expense growth to MRVL's 108.32%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-47.91%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 17.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.32%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 9.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.92%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 14.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.92%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 23.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.71%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.84%
Diluted share increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.