PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.91%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 2.48%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
9.11%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
16.69%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.35%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.95%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 3.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.96%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.70%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x MRVL's 2.34%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
6.17%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 3.33%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.27%
Interest expense change of 2.27% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
3.13%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
91.72%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
69.80%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
91.72%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
69.80%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.83%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 454.78%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
88.35%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 1.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
66.82%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.05%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 594.63%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
96.98%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
74.45%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 6.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
92.00%
Diluted EPS change of 92.00% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.52%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.10%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.