PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.31%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.69%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
17.74%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.11%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.06%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1323.05%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.15%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.22%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.57%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.70%
D&A growth 50-75% of MRVL's 3.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
121.57%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
56.66%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
80.64%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
56.66%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-74.74%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
74.67%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
51.48%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.28%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
75.63%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.32%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
77.08%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
72.92%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.54%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.92%
Diluted share increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.