PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.07%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-8.13%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-8.02%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.06%
Margin expansion below 50% of MRVL's 0.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.87%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.53%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.57%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of MRVL's 6.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-3.00%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 2.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-70.24%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.19%
D&A growth less than half of MRVL's 8.83%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-16.26%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
79.66%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 160.79%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-26.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.76%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-16.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.65%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.66%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.35%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.09%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.