PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.85%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 15.39%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
8.77%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 20.44%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
7.13%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MRVL's 10.75%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-0.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.58%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.25%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-245.64%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.78%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 0.54%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
4.73%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 10.72%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.06%
Interest expense change of 4.06% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
1.43%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.61%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
17.50%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MRVL's 53.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.87%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to MRVL's 29.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
33.59%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 83.20%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.87%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 58.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-92.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
26.53%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 60.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.32%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 39.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
48.00%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.11%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 66.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.14%
Net margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 44.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.00%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 61.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 75.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.55%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.11% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.