PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.56%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.06%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
11.80%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.96%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.07%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
262.88%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 12.32%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
2.01%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.04%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
97.29%
Interest expense change of 97.29% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-12.58%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 4.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.76%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 1.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
15.52%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.72%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 5.13%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.59%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 5.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
295.97%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 804.88%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
19.37%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 16.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
9.95%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of MRVL's 16.44%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-3.42%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 195.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
23.74%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.37%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
13.98%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
30.00%
EPS change of 30.00% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
26.00%
Diluted EPS change of 26.00% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-2.13%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 1.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.94%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.85% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.