PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.00%
Revenue growth below 50% of MRVL's 0.39%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-2.96%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
2.44%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MRVL's 4.27%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
2.44%
Margin expansion 50-75% of MRVL's 3.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
0.86%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.81%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.65%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.24%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.48%
Interest expense growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.95%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.61%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 18.35%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.93%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 17.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.81%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 29.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.81%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 29.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-165.14%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 276.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.30%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 39.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.31%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 39.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.44%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-6.26%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 39.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.26%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 39.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.33%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 35.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.33%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 42.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 1.33% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.03%
Diluted share increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.