PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.11%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.40%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
9.33%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.61%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 1.53% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.88%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.76%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 13770.40%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.66%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.71%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.14%
Interest expense change of 0.14% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-0.23%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 0.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
23.32%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.50%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
30.72%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.65%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.21%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.69%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.48%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 181.26%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
35.16%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.64%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.93%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.82%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.87%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.17%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.