PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.05%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.41%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
3.38%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.31%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.40%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
250.40%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.10%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
0.72%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.45%
Interest expense change of 0.45% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-2.75%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-73.35%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 10.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.36%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.35%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.18%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.07%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.99%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.80%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.80%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
11.66%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.41%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.82%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.66%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.29%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.