PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.96%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-9.60%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.66%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.41%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.66%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while MRVL shows 18.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-631.91%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.82%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.35%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.50%
Interest expense change of 3.50% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
0.08%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
224.77%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.85%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.06%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 109.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.41%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 71.31%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-30.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.82%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.82%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.89%
Share count reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.52%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
2.05%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.97%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.