PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.36%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.83%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
7.77%
Similar gross profit growth to MRVL's 7.50%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
0.38%
Margin expansion below 50% of MRVL's 17.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.56%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.99%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.99%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.17%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.30%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MRVL's 82.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.10%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 190.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.86%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 103.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.19%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 103.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.27%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 105.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.81%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 106.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4700.00%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.85%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 106.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.62%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 107.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.64%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 108.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 108.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.55%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.30% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
4.96%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.74%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.