PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.85%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-9.18%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-5.06%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.93%
Similar margin change to MRVL's 2.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
0.58%
Similar R&D growth to MRVL's 0.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while MRVL shows 0.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-300.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.02%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.17%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.49%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.37%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.50%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 581.46%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-4.74%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.26%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.17%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-5.31%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.65%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.26%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.68%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.37%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.67%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.