PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.43%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 15.82%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
8.66%
Similar cost growth to MRVL's 10.96%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
9.99%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MRVL's 20.31%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.51%
Margin expansion below 50% of MRVL's 3.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.16%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 11673.26%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.40%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.72%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.97%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.44%
D&A growth less than half of MRVL's 20.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
26.17%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MRVL's 600.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.09%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 1463.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
29.39%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 235.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.24%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 217.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.54%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 265.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.21%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 243.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
42.22%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.08%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 326.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.96%
Net margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 295.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.33%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 324.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.48%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 324.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.56%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
5.70%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.