PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.13%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.41%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
17.92%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 3.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
13.22%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.75%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.66%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 0.32% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.22%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.78%
Similar other expenses growth to MRVL's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
3.02%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.50%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.25%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 56.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.26%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.87%
Similar EBITDA growth to MRVL's 23.42%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
9.99%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of MRVL's 19.56%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
24.19%
Similar operating income growth to MRVL's 25.76%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
7.87%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 20.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
77.78%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 803.02%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
27.61%
Similar pre-tax income growth to MRVL's 28.69%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
10.84%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 23.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
248.28%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.99%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 55.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.12%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 48.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.64%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 57.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 52.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.84%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.25%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.