PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.43%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.03%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
14.79%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.94%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.96%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x MRVL's 8.78%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2400.00%
Other expenses change of 2400.00% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
8.01%
Similar operating expenses growth to MRVL's 10.55%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
5.57%
Similar total costs growth to MRVL's 5.85%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.20%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.85%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.64%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 21.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.89%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.56%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
500.00%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.31%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.95%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-168.97%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 48.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
33.41%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.81%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.43%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.50%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.