PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.68%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-20.79%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-37.17%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.94%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 266.55%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
5.79%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.99%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.67%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
14.71%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-64.26%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.57%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
30.43%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of MRVL's 42.96%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-70.03%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.09%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 1956.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-53.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.90%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.06%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.96%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.