PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
25.52%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.85%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
47.86%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
13.52%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 9.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-9.56%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 4.81% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
35.65%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.98%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
52.80%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
116.00%
Interest expense growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
277.57%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.13%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.62%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 35.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-940.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-37.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-120.31%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-32.17%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.43%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.43%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.33%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.61%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.