PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.15%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 4.32%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.08%
Similar cost growth to MRVL's 9.94%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
14.95%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.59%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.52%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 9.88%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1250.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 268.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
1.39%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 29.23%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.98%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 19.59%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.09%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 14.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
31.38%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.11%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.79%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.71%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
337.84%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.05%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.89%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
915.38%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x MRVL's 29.49%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
31.23%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.98%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.51%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.03%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.32%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 2.95%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.79%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.