PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.94%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MRVL's 29.27%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
12.80%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 70.00%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
16.15%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.05%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.98%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 28.29%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.04%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.86%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 28.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.66%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 47.53%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
13.21%
Interest expense growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.78%
D&A growth less than half of MRVL's 90.01%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
15.22%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.24%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.95%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.70%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-156.82%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 24.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
17.12%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.90%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-84.85%
Tax expense reduction while MRVL shows 7.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.16%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.02%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.38%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.68%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.36%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 18.41%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 18.42%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.