PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.44%
Similar revenue growth to MRVL's 7.74%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
8.06%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 6.01%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
8.64%
Similar gross profit growth to MRVL's 9.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
0.19%
Margin expansion below 50% of MRVL's 1.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.37%
Similar R&D growth to MRVL's 11.23%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.47%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of MRVL's 136.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
8.92%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.51%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.43%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 5.26%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.48%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
8.09%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.78%
EBITDA decline while MRVL shows 3.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.48%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-37.10%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 101.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.00%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 86.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
40.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 6.07%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-37.00%
Pre-tax income decline while MRVL shows 1790.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.90%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 1654.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
235.51%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 5104.89%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-46.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.83%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.08%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.