PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.11%
Revenue decline while MRVL shows 4.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
32.62%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 5.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-46.33%
Gross profit decline while MRVL shows 4.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-33.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.73%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.10%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.54%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.32%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.46%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.15%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-4.41%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.17%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.14%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-58.41%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-68.12%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 6.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.29%
Operating income decline while MRVL shows 79.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.98%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 71.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
61.90%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-73.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-196.79%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-59.46%
Net income decline while MRVL shows 102.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.88%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 102.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.00%
EPS decline while MRVL shows 102.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-59.38%
Diluted EPS decline while MRVL shows 102.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.44%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 2.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.83%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 1.17% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.