PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.02%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-19.46%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
20.65%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
18.26%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.36%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.04%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.04%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.54%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 9.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.93%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.98%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
64.21%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.77%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
108.99%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
104.84%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
166.67%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
110.11%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.95%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-88.06%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
107.94%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
103.82%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
111.11%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
111.11%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.77%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.88%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.