PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.86%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.70%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
21.26%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.02%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.94%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 8.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.05%
Other expenses change of 21.05% while MRVL maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-2.68%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 5.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.36%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 3.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
3.13%
Interest expense growth less than half of MRVL's 6.90%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-9.86%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
49.38%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.82%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.38%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.35%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
115.63%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
71.51%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.30%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
231.75%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
44.48%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.56%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
45.61%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.86%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.24%
Share count reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.30%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.52%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 0.30%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.