PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
21.98%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.56%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
12.54%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
25.31%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 20.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
2.73%
Margin expansion below 50% of MRVL's 19.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.45%
R&D growth while MRVL reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
495.45%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.50%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.20%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.03%
Similar D&A growth to MRVL's 5.32%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
32.85%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of MRVL's 57.20%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
8.91%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 66.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.69%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 94.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.14%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 94.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
368.57%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
34.06%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of MRVL's 53.44%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
9.90%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 53.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
42.38%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 1416.38%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
32.91%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.96%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.58%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.43%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.08%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.24% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.24% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.