176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.83%
Positive growth while MRVL shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.14%
Cost increase while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
21.53%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.14%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.34%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 3.59%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.26%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
10.07%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.66%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.61%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.59%
Interest expense growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.94%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.96%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.51%
EBITDA margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.20%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.41%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-24.80%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 37.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.49%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.96%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.69%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.13%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 45.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.80%
Net margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 32.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.00%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 44.44%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.45%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of MRVL's 44.44%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.03% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.04%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.03% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.