PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.34%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 9.65%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
32.42%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 8.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
10.62%
Similar gross profit growth to MRVL's 11.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-4.09%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 1.53% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
13.60%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.23%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
12.44%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.18%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
24.77%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.60%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-4.69%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.61%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 4.30%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
11.01%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MRVL's 34.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.75%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 22.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.25%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 34.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.42%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 40.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
54.59%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.20%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 26.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.59%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 32.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.05%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 164.61%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
11.54%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 10.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-3.29%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 18.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.33%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 12.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
11.67%
Similar diluted EPS growth to MRVL's 12.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-0.17%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.17%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.08% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.