PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.64%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.02%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.58%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
15.78%
R&D growth above 1.5x MU's 5.92%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.29%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.24%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.37%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 2.58%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
20.44%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.15%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.90%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.28%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.71%
Other expenses growth less than half of MU's 220.16%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
25.08%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.16%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.71%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.25%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.31%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.63%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
3.57%
Diluted share increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.