PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.76%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.93%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
14.50%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.96%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.26%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.01%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.80%
D&A growth while MU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.91%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.53%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
208.58%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.16%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.32%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.17%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.16%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.32%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-41.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
103.97%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 2.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
104.39%
Diluted share increase while MU reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.