PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.30%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.43%
Cost growth 50-75% of MU's 29.98%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
16.08%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.34%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.32%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.25%
Total costs growth 50-75% of MU's 21.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.02%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 4.85%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
26.76%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.00%
EBITDA margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.27%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.58%
Operating margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.98%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.62%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.16%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.62%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.62%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.16%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
157.14%
EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
150.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-48.95%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-49.43%
Diluted share reduction while MU shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.