PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.12%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.79%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
12.17%
Positive growth while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.86%
Margin expansion while MU shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.07%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.13%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MU's 75.09%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
10.92%
Similar total costs growth to MU's 10.18%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.43%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 5.88%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
7.41%
EBITDA growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.58%
Operating income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
42.92%
Other expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.65%
Pre-tax income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.48%
Pre-tax margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.64%
Tax expense growth while MU reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.66%
Net income growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.49%
Net margin growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.11%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.67%
Diluted EPS growth while MU declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.61%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.61%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.