PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.41%
Positive growth while MU shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.37%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
11.96%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 65.66%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.41%
Margin expansion below 50% of MU's 61.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.01%
R&D growth less than half of MU's 47.00%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.76%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.13%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.68%
D&A growth above 1.5x MU's 0.81%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
9.67%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MU's 78.16%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.76%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MU's 71.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-19.51%
Operating income decline while MU shows 51.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.10%
Operating margin decline while MU shows 44.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.57%
Other expenses reduction while MU shows 109.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.09%
Pre-tax income decline while MU shows 56.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.72%
Pre-tax margin decline while MU shows 50.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.14%
Tax expense reduction while MU shows 60.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.72%
Net income decline while MU shows 53.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.57%
Net margin decline while MU shows 47.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.75%
Diluted EPS decline while MU shows 54.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.34%
Share count reduction while MU shows 0.28% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
2.39%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.25%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.