PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.02%
Revenue growth below 50% of MU's 52.37%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
9.41%
Cost increase while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
5.99%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MU's 167.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.88%
Margin decline while MU shows 144.14% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.31%
R&D growth while MU reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.82%
Operating expenses growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.56%
Total costs growth while MU reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.35%
D&A growth while MU reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.74%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MU's 250.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-16.40%
EBITDA margin decline while MU shows 197.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
44.10%
Operating income growth 50-75% of MU's 86.95%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
33.40%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MU's 91.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-39.42%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
29.80%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MU's 88.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.16%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MU's 92.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
29.80%
Tax expense growth less than half of MU's 88.54%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
29.80%
Net income growth below 50% of MU's 88.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.16%
Net margin growth below 50% of MU's 92.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.00%
EPS growth below 50% of MU's 88.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.08%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MU's 88.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.33%
Share count reduction below 50% of MU's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
2.77%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MU's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.